Top Performing Decklists
| Deck | Creator | Record | Best Finish |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gruul Delirium | nishihyuma | 9-3 | None |
| Mono Black Demons | callmestar | 6-2 | None |
| Esper Pixie | arcanetrickster | 8-6 | None |
| Izzet Prowess | rudá dos reis | 6-2 | None |
| Esper Pixie | dr4gun0v | 6-8 | None |
Performance Stats (Last 14 Days)
Win Rate Impact
Top Table Win Rate
Meta Trend
Sample Size
Tournament Results
Average Copies
Archetypes Using This Card:
Azorius Omniscience , Dimir Midrange , Domain Zur Overlords , Esper Pixie , Golgari Midrange , Golgari Roots , Gruul Delirium , Izzet Prowess , Jeskai Control , Mono Black Demons
Meta Performance Analysis
Emrakul, the Promised End ranks #5062 out of approximately 5129 cards in raw efficiency (top 99%).
Game Impact Factor
Color Differential
Colorless average: 45.6%
Performance compared to other Colorless cardsBased on our comprehensive multi-metric analysis, Emrakul, the Promised End is an underperforming card in the current meta.
Recommended number of copies: 1
Win Rate Timeline
Card Efficiency Analysis
Raw Efficiency (Win Rate/Mana)
Relative Efficiency
Performance Efficiency: 1.62 (Win rate × Top 8 rate ÷ Mana value)
At 13 mana, the average win rate in the format is 58.7%. Emrakul, the Promised End has a win rate of 66.7%, making it 13.5% better than other 13-mana cards.
Top Performing Partners
| Card Name | Type | Deck Count | Win Rate | 1st Places |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dismember | Instant | 5 | 85.0% | 2 |
| Liliana of the Veil | Legendary Planeswalker — Liliana | 5 | 83.6% | 3 |
| Thoughtseize | Sorcery | 6 | 82.1% | 3 |
| Inquisition of Kozilek | Sorcery | 6 | 82.1% | 3 |
| Duress | Sorcery | 5 | 81.4% | 2 |
| Mind Stone | Artifact | 6 | 81.2% | 2 |
| Wurmcoil Engine | Artifact Creature — Phyrexian Wurm | 6 | 70.2% | 2 |
| Fatal Push | Instant | 5 | 60.0% | 3 |
| Mental Misstep | Instant | 5 | 58.6% | 0 |
| Toxic Deluge | Sorcery | 8 | 56.9% | 2 |
Card Synergy Analysis
Cards that perform better with Emrakul, the Promised End than they do on average. A positive synergy score indicates stronger performance together.
| Card Name | Type | Mana | Decks | Win Rate Together | Win Rate Apart | Synergy Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thoughtseize | Sorcery | 1 | 5 | 91.3% | 60.1% | +31.2% |
| Inquisition of Kozilek | Sorcery | 1 | 5 | 91.3% | 61.6% | +29.7% |
| Dismember | Instant | 3 | 5 | 84.6% | 63.4% | +21.2% |
| Mind Stone | Artifact | 2 | 5 | 82.4% | 62.3% | +20.0% |
| Fatal Push | Instant | 1 | 5 | 79.2% | 60.3% | +18.9% |
| Toxic Deluge | Sorcery | 3 | 6 | 77.8% | 59.7% | +18.1% |
| Wurmcoil Engine | Artifact Creature — Phyrexian Wurm | 6 | 5 | 72.4% | 63.6% | +8.8% |
| Arcane Signet | Artifact | 2 | 5 | 66.7% | 62.2% | +4.4% |
| Teferi, Time Raveler | Legendary Planeswalker — Teferi | 3 | 6 | 54.3% | 60.5% | -6.3% |
| Snapcaster Mage | Creature — Human Wizard | 2 | 6 | 51.9% | 60.8% | -8.9% |
Top Archetypes
| Archetype | Deck Count | % of Archetype | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|
| Esper Pixie | 6 | 0.3% | 29.6% |
| Mono Black Demons | 5 | 2.6% | 85.0% |
| Azorius Omniscience | 3 | 0.5% | 47.0% |
| Golgari Midrange | 2 | 0.2% | 25.0% |
| Gruul Delirium | 2 | 1.2% | 62.5% |
Statistics Explanation
| Statistic | Description | Formula |
|---|---|---|
| Win Rate Impact | How much this card increases or decreases the win rate of decks that include it, compared to the average deck in the format. | (Win rate of decks with this card) - (Average win rate of all decks) |
| Top Table Win Rate | A weighted win rate that gives more significance to performance in higher tournament placements. First place finishes count for 2x, with diminishing weight down to 8th place. | ∑(wins × placement_weight) / ∑((wins + losses) × placement_weight) |
| Meta Trend | Shows if the card is performing better or worse in the most recent period compared to earlier periods. Positive values indicate improving performance. | (Win rate in recent half of time period) - (Win rate in earlier half of time period) |
| Confidence Factor | A measure of statistical reliability based on sample size. The progress bar indicates how confident we are in the statistics (with larger sample sizes providing higher confidence). | log10(Number of decks + 1) |
| Average Copies | The average number of copies of this card included in decks that use it. | ∑(Copies in each deck) / (Number of decks) |
| Card Synergy Score | Measures how well this card performs with other cards compared to their individual performance. | (Win rate together) - (Average of individual win rates) |
| Raw Efficiency | Win rate points per mana invested. Higher values indicate better returns on mana investment. | (Win rate) / (Mana value) |
| Relative Efficiency | How efficient this card is compared to the average card of the same mana value. | ((Win rate) / (Format average win rate for same mana)) / (Mana value) |
| Performance Efficiency | Combined metric that accounts for win rate, tournament success, and mana investment. | (Win rate × Top 8 placement rate) / (Mana value) |
| Game Impact Factor | A measure of how much this card affects game outcomes, based on win rate adjusted by its deviation from the format average. | Win rate × (1 + (Win rate - Format average) / 100) |
| Color Differential | How this card's win rate compares to the average win rate of other cards of the same color. | Win rate - Average win rate for same color |
All statistics are calculated using tournament data from the selected time period. Sample sizes below 10 decks may not provide statistically significant results.